Municipalities enabling and validating act date dating find
1620, 1995", as originally adopted;"Naramata special debt financing service" means a service of the regional district under Part 24 of the (a) that is established to recover the costs of authorized borrowing, and(b) for which the service area is the Naramata service area;"parcel tax" means a parcel tax referred to in subsection (4);"regional district" means the Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen.(2) If the regional district proposes to establish a Naramata special debt financing service,(a) despite section 800.1 (1) (e) of the , the establishing bylaw does not require the approval of the electors but does require the approval of the Inspector of Municipalities.(3) If a Naramata special debt financing service is established, any authorized borrowing is deemed to be borrowing done or authorized in relation to that service and any security issued in relation to the authorized borrowing is deemed to be security issued in relation to borrowing for that service.(4) If all or part of the costs of the Naramata special debt financing service are to be recovered by means of a parcel tax under the , the assessment roll bylaw under section 360.1 of that Act may provide that, if the same person or persons own more than one parcel in the Naramata service area,(a) unless circumstances referred to in paragraph (b) or (c) apply, the parcel tax is imposed only in relation to one of those parcels,(b) in circumstances specified in the bylaw, the parcel tax is imposed in relation to some but not all of those parcels, and(c) in circumstances specified in the bylaw, no parcel tax is imposed in relation to any of those parcels.(5) For the purposes of subsection (4), the bylaw referred to in that subsection must establish criteria for determining which of the parcels owned by the same person or persons is to be subject to the tax, which criteria may be based on one or more of the following:(a) the nature of the interest of the owners in the parcels;(b) the nature of improvements on the parcels;(c) the assessed value of the parcels;(d) the taxable area of the parcels.(6) If applicable, the bylaw referred to in subsection (4) must establish circumstances in which the parcel tax is or is not imposed as referred to in subsection (4) (b) and (c).(7) If the authority under subsection (4) has been exercised, in addition to the grounds specified in section 361.3 of the , the owner of a parcel that is to be subject to the parcel tax may make a complaint to the local court of revision on the ground that (a) there is an error or omission in relation to the parcel respecting the application of criteria established under subsection (5), or(b) there is an error or omission in relation to the parcel respecting the application of circumstances established under subsection (6).(8) A complaint under subsection (7) is deemed,(a) in the first year that the parcel tax is imposed, to be a complaint under section 361.3 of the .(9) If(a) the same person or persons own more than one parcel in the Naramata service area,(b) the parcel tax is imposed in relation to only one of those parcels in accordance with subsection (4) (a), and(c) that parcel tax is waived under section 360 (4) (b) in relation to that parcel,that tax is deemed to be waived in relation to the parcels, owned at that time by the same person or persons, in relation to which, in accordance with subsection (4) (a), no parcel tax was imposed.(10) If(a) the same person or persons own more than one parcel in the Naramata service area,(b) the parcel tax is imposed in relation to some but not all of those parcels in accordance with subsection (4) (b), and(c) that parcel tax is waived under section 360 (4) (b) in relation to each of the parcels on which the tax was imposed,that tax is deemed to be waived in relation to the parcels, owned at that time by the same person or persons, in relation to which, in accordance with subsection (4) (b), no parcel tax was imposed.(11) Despite section 375 of the , the regional district may, by bylaw, establish how the parcel tax imposed under this section is to be dealt with if a parcel subject to the tax is subdivided, including establishing that the parcel tax is to be imposed on only one of the parcels created by subdivision or that the tax is to be apportioned in accordance with the bylaw.(12) This section comes into force by regulation of the Lieutenant Governor in Council. (1) In this section:"port authority" means a municipality, regional district or prescribed community port authority that has assumed a port lease;"port lease" means a lease of a part of a parcel of land, if the lease(a) is assumed by a port authority in relation to an agreement for the transfer of port property to it by the government of Canada, and(b) has a term exceeding 3 years;"renew" includes the making of a subsequent lease in relation to the same property between the parties to a port lease or their successors, heirs or assigns.(2) Despite section 73 (1) (b) of the , a port lease is confirmed and validated as an effective contract between the parties as of the date on which the lease is assumed by the port authority.(3) If a port lease has been assumed by a port authority before the coming into force of this section, the port authority may continue and renew the lease as if subsection (2) had come into force before the assumption of that lease.(4) For the purposes of subsection (2), a port authority is deemed to have had the authority to assume a port lease and become the lessor under the lease at the time of the assumption and to have had and to continue to have the authority to carry out and to renew that lease in accordance with its terms.(5) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may prescribe an organization to be a community port authority for the purposes of this section, and, on being prescribed, this section applies to the port authority retroactively to the date on which the port lease was assumed.(6) This section is retroactive to the extent necessary to give full force and effect to its provisions and must not be construed as lacking retroactive effect in relation to any matter because it makes no specific reference to that matter. of 6 to 10 s/o former CPR R/W and 11; 12 to 16 and 17 to 21 s/o former R/W; Ptn.
(1) In this section:"anti-smoking bylaw" means a bylaw adopted by a local government that(a) prohibits or regulates or purports to prohibit or regulate the smoking or other use or consumption of tobacco products in classes of premises specified in the bylaw, and(b) was approved or purported to be approved by a Provincial health officer during the period starting on April 1, 1996 and ending on August 9, 1996 pursuant to a delegation or a purported delegation under section 4 (2) of the , R. (1) This section applies to all current or former zoning bylaws of the City of Vancouver.(2) A zoning bylaw that is or was invalid by reason of a failure to comply with the approval requirement of section 54 (2) of the is conclusively deemed to have been validly in force, from the date it would have been in force had the approval requirement been met, to the extent that it would have been validly in force had the approval requirement been met.(3) This section is retroactive to the extent necessary to give full force and effect to its provisions and must not be construed as lacking retroactive effect in relation to any matter by reason that it makes no specific reference to that matter. 418/89, as if it had adopted an establishing bylaw for the service.(2) The authority to continue providing the service referred to in subsection (1) ends one year after the date on which this section comes into force unless the regional district has adopted an establishing bylaw for the service before that date.(3) Division 4.1 applies to the establishing bylaw required by subsection (2), with the exception that the bylaw may be adopted with the approval of the inspector of municipalities but without the approval of the electors in the participating areas for the service.(4) All resolutions, bylaws and actions of the regional district in relation to the service referred to in subsection (1) are conclusively deemed to have been validly adopted or taken as of the date that they were adopted or taken, to the extent they would have been valid had this section been in force on the date they were adopted or taken.(5) This section is retroactive to the extent necessary to give full force and effect to its provisions and must not be construed as lacking retroactive effect in relation to any matter because it makes no specific reference to that matter.
But if you want an election that defies any sort of traditional analysis, travel north of 41st Avenue and west of Blanca.The Corporation of the District of Surrey shall be deemed to have had full power and authority to grant aid to the Surrey Dyking District in the year 1962 and in any previous year, and the making of such grants and the procedures followed in so doing are declared to have been validly exercised.1963-30-2., and any other Act, the agreement entered into between The Corporation of the District of Surrey and the Greater Vancouver Water District on the twenty-eighth day of December, 1961, and the agreement entered into between The Corporation of the District of Surrey and the Greater Vancouver Water District on the thirty-first day of January, 1962, are valid and binding on The Corporation of the District of Surrey and the Greater Vancouver Water District, whether the same would otherwise be ultra vires of either or both of the corporations or not; and the respective parties to the agreements may carry out and give full force and effect to every covenant, agreement, stipulation, condition, and provision in the agreements, according to the terms thereof; and everything done by the Greater Vancouver Water District under and by virtue of the agreements is and shall be deemed to be for the purpose of the undertakings authorized by the ; and any indebtedness of The Corporation of the District of Surrey under and by virtue of the agreements shall be excluded from the general debt of the municipality in determining its borrowing powers and shall not be deemed to be an indebtedness of the municipality for the creation of debts by the issue of debentures or otherwise.1962-43-3., the Council of The Corporation of the District of Surrey (hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation") may adopt, without the assent of the owner-electors, by-laws(a) for the purpose of the construction of a system of trunk sewerage-works for the collection, conveyance, and disposal of sewage, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forcemain sewers and their pump-houses and such ancillary drainage-works for the impounding, conveying, and discharging of surface and other waters, as are necessary for the proper laying-out and construction of the said system of sewerage-works; and the total amount to be raised annually for the retirement of debt (including principal and interest) incurred for such works shall be levied and raised by a mill rate on the taxable assessed values for general purposes of land only of all real property within the area to be benefited, as defined by the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District, save for land defined by any by-law of the Corporation now or hereafter as agricultural land, or such lesser area as the Council may from time to time define by by-law; and(b) for the purpose of constructing lateral sewerage-works for the collection, conveyance, and disposal of sewage, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, such manholes and connecting drains as it deems necessary; and the amount required annually for the retirement of debt (including principal and interest) incurred for such works may be raised by the imposition of rates and charges pursuant to section 532 of the ;and the amount required for the operation and maintenance of the works referred to in clauses (a) and (b) may be raised in the manner provided in clause (b).(2) Clause (b) of subsection (1) of section 253 of the (1) Subject to subsection (2), where, in the opinion of the Council of The Corporation of the District of Surrey (hereinafter called the "Corporation"), it is not possible or desirable to install public utilities in, on, or over streets or lanes, the Council may from time to time, for the purpose of providing such public utilities,(a) determine and define the location and extent of(i) the land within the municipality on, over, or under which the utilities shall pass; and(ii) what other land within the municipality shall be required for access to and from the aforesaid lands to construct, repair, and maintain the utilities adequately; and(b) prepare, or cause to be prepared, a plan or plans showing to the satisfaction of the Registrar of the New Westminster Land Titles District the location and extent of the lands so determined and defined by the Council and whether the said lands will be used for the utilities or only for access thereto and therefrom.(2) This section applies only where the land on, over, or under which the utilities shall pass is capable of being directly connected to the utility works to be installed on, over, or under that land.(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in paragraph (i) of clause (a) of subsection (1), the Council of the Corporation shall not include any land on, over, or under which utilities are to pass where such land is more than 3 m from the nearest registered property-line, measured at right angles to such line, without first having applied to the Board of Variance established pursuant to section 708 of the for an adjudication as to the necessity of the Corporation determining and defining such land pursuant to this section, and whether or not such determination causes undue hardship to the owner concerned.Where the Board is satisfied that the proposed easement is necessary and no undue hardship will be caused, it shall so certify.(1) This section applies only to The Corporation of the District of Kitimat, The Corporation of the District of North Cowichan, and The Corporation of the District of Powell River.(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the in respect of any debenture debts outstanding as at the thirty-first day of December, 1964, during the currency of any debentures issued under the by-laws authorizing the said debts.(3) Debenture debts under subsection (2) include indebtedness of The Corporation of the District of Powell River incurred under section 247 of the , becomes redeemable, the Council of the municipality concerned may cause to be transferred in trust to the Minister of Finance the full amount of money required to redeem any debentures and interest coupons of such series unpresented for redemption.(2) The Minister of Finance shall, upon presentation to the municipality of any unredeemed debentures referred to in subsection (1), pay to the municipality, upon the order of its Treasurer, the principal amount of the debentures together with the value of any interest coupons attached thereto.(3) Upon the transfer to the Minister of Finance of the full amount of money required under subsection (1) for any such debentures, the said debentures shall be deemed to have been redeemed and fully paid for the purposes of the applicable Act aforesaid.1965-30-2. The creation of a deficit or portion thereof in the general revenue fund operations of any municipality in and for the year ending on the thirty-first day of December, 1958, by the participation of the municipality in the Municipal Winter Works Incentive Programme of the Government of Canada shall not be construed as a violation of the provisions of subsection (1) of section 247 of the , but such deficit or portion thereof shall be a first charge upon the general revenue of that municipality for the year 1959 and shall be included as an expenditure for recovery in the annual budget for the year 1959.1959-57-2., Division (3) of Part IX of that Act applies to the Local District of Cache Creek, and all acts and things done by the Council or by the Commissioner of that municipality prior to the enactment of this section relating to the imposition of a frontage tax for waterworks purposes are valid and are deemed to have been within the powers of the said municipality.1961-45-3.or any other Act, the Lieutenant-Governor in Council may by Order appoint a Commissioner to determine and redefine the boundaries of any municipality deemed by such Order to be uncertain, and upon such determination being approved by the Minister, the Lieutenant-Governor in Council may by supplementary Letters Patent redefine the boundaries of the municipality accordingly.1968-35-2. or any other Act, The Corporation of the Village of Cumberland may grant and convey to the Board of School Trustees of School District No.736, 1982", adopted by the board of the Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen on October 21, 1982, shall be conclusively deemed to have been validly adopted on that date and to have been in force since it was adopted on that date.(3) A tax or charge that would have been validly collected had the bylaws referred to in subsections (1) and (2) been in force at the time it was collected shall be conclusively deemed to have been validly collected as though the bylaws were in force at that time.(4) Everything done that would have been validly done had the bylaws referred to in subsections (1) and (2) been validly adopted on the dates they were adopted shall be conclusively deemed to have been validly done, notwithstanding a decision of any court to the contrary.(5) The Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen may, by bylaw under section 767 of the , with the costs of the service to be recovered by means of a parcel tax.(6) This section is retroactive to the extent necessary to give full force and effect to its provisions and shall not be construed as lacking retroactive effect in relation to any matter by reason that it makes no specific reference to that matter.1991-5-2., the bylaw cited as "Loan Authorization By-Law No.531, 1990 (Fire Apparatus)" adopted by the council of the Village of Harrison Hot Springs on November 27, 1990 shall be conclusively deemed to have been validly adopted on that date and to have been in force since it was adopted on that date.(2) Notwithstanding the regarding the loan authorization bylaw referred to in subsection (1), the bylaw cited as "The Corporation of the Village of Harrison Hot Springs Fire Department Apparatus Security Issuing Bylaw No.